Claude and the Constitutional AI Approach

March 27, 2023

Anthropic released Claude to the public this month, and it’s worth paying attention to—not just as another LLM, but for what it represents. Constitutional AI, the approach behind Claude, offers a different philosophy for making AI systems helpful, harmless, and honest.

Here’s what makes Claude and Constitutional AI interesting.

What Is Constitutional AI

The Approach

constitutional_ai:
  core_idea:
    - Define a "constitution" of principles
    - Train AI to follow these principles
    - Self-critique and revision during training

  principles_examples:
    - Be helpful, harmless, and honest
    - Avoid encouraging illegal activities
    - Be respectful and considerate
    - Acknowledge uncertainty

  training_process:
    1: Generate responses to prompts
    2: Self-critique against constitution
    3: Revise responses based on critique
    4: Use revised data for training

Why It Matters

significance:
  transparency:
    - Principles are explicit, not hidden
    - Users can understand the constraints
    - Researchers can evaluate alignment

  scalability:
    - Self-critique reduces human labeling
    - Principles can be updated
    - Easier to debug behavior

  flexibility:
    - Different constitutions for different uses
    - Customizable for enterprise
    - Evolve with societal values

Claude vs. GPT-4

Different Philosophies

approach_comparison:
  openai_gpt4:
    safety_approach: RLHF with human feedback
    transparency: Limited visibility into constraints
    focus: Capability + safety guardrails

  anthropic_claude:
    safety_approach: Constitutional AI
    transparency: Principles more visible
    focus: Safety-first design

Practical Differences

usage_differences:
  claude_strengths:
    - Longer context window (100K tokens)
    - More nuanced refusals
    - Better at explaining its reasoning
    - Consistent personality

  claude_considerations:
    - Sometimes more conservative
    - Different API structure
    - Smaller ecosystem currently

  evaluation:
    - Try both for your use case
    - Different models excel at different tasks
    - Safety profiles may differ

Using Claude Effectively

API Basics

import anthropic

client = anthropic.Anthropic()

response = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-2",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[
        {"role": "user", "content": "Explain constitutional AI simply."}
    ]
)

print(response.content[0].text)

System Prompts

# Claude respects system prompts for context
response = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-2",
    max_tokens=1024,
    system="You are a technical writer helping document APIs.",
    messages=[
        {"role": "user", "content": "Document this endpoint: GET /users/{id}"}
    ]
)

Implications for Development

Multi-Model Strategy

multi_model_approach:
  why:
    - Different models for different tasks
    - Reduce single-provider dependency
    - Optimize cost and quality

  considerations:
    - API differences require abstraction
    - Safety profiles vary
    - Feature availability differs

  recommendation:
    - Abstract LLM calls
    - Test across providers
    - Choose per use case

Key Takeaways

Competition and different approaches make AI development healthier.