Claude 3: First Look at Anthropic's New Models

March 4, 2024

Anthropic just released Claude 3, their most capable model family yet. With three tiers—Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku—they’re offering options for different use cases and budgets. Early testing shows impressive results, particularly for complex reasoning and coding.

Here’s my first look at Claude 3.

The Model Family

Three Tiers

claude_3_family:
  opus:
    positioning: Most capable, frontier
    use_case: Complex analysis, research, coding
    context: 200K tokens
    cost: Higher

  sonnet:
    positioning: Balanced capability and cost
    use_case: General tasks, production workloads
    context: 200K tokens
    cost: Moderate

  haiku:
    positioning: Fast and affordable
    use_case: High-volume, simple tasks
    context: 200K tokens
    cost: Lower

Capability Improvements

improvements:
  reasoning:
    - Better multi-step reasoning
    - Improved mathematical capabilities
    - More accurate analysis

  coding:
    - Better code generation
    - Improved debugging
    - Multi-file understanding

  vision:
    - Native image understanding
    - Document analysis
    - Chart interpretation

  context:
    - 200K context window
    - Better long-context performance
    - Improved retrieval within context

  safety:
    - Reduced refusals for benign requests
    - Better nuanced responses
    - Maintained safety boundaries

API Usage

Basic Integration

import anthropic

client = anthropic.Anthropic()

# Using Claude 3 Opus
response = client.messages.create(
    model="claude-3-opus-20240229",
    max_tokens=1024,
    messages=[
        {"role": "user", "content": "Analyze this code for security issues."}
    ]
)

print(response.content[0].text)

Vision Capabilities

import base64

def analyze_image(image_path: str, prompt: str) -> str:
    with open(image_path, "rb") as f:
        image_data = base64.standard_b64encode(f.read()).decode()

    response = client.messages.create(
        model="claude-3-opus-20240229",
        max_tokens=1024,
        messages=[
            {
                "role": "user",
                "content": [
                    {
                        "type": "image",
                        "source": {
                            "type": "base64",
                            "media_type": "image/png",
                            "data": image_data
                        }
                    },
                    {
                        "type": "text",
                        "text": prompt
                    }
                ]
            }
        ]
    )

    return response.content[0].text

# Analyze an architecture diagram
result = analyze_image(
    "architecture.png",
    "Describe this system architecture and identify potential issues."
)

Choosing the Right Model

class ClaudeRouter:
    """Route requests to appropriate Claude 3 model."""

    MODELS = {
        "opus": "claude-3-opus-20240229",
        "sonnet": "claude-3-sonnet-20240229",
        "haiku": "claude-3-haiku-20240307"
    }

    def select_model(self, request: dict) -> str:
        # Opus for complex tasks
        if request.get("complexity") == "high":
            return self.MODELS["opus"]

        # Haiku for simple, high-volume
        if request.get("volume") == "high" and request.get("complexity") == "low":
            return self.MODELS["haiku"]

        # Sonnet as default
        return self.MODELS["sonnet"]

Comparison with GPT-4

Strengths and Trade-offs

claude_3_vs_gpt4:
  claude_3_strengths:
    - Longer context (200K vs 128K)
    - Often more nuanced responses
    - Better at following complex instructions
    - More balanced safety (fewer unnecessary refusals)

  gpt4_strengths:
    - Larger ecosystem
    - More integrations
    - Established track record
    - Function calling maturity

  similar:
    - Overall capability tier
    - Vision capabilities
    - Coding ability

When to Use Which

model_selection:
  prefer_claude_3:
    - Long document analysis
    - Nuanced writing tasks
    - Complex instruction following
    - Research and analysis

  prefer_gpt4:
    - Existing GPT integrations
    - Specific function calling needs
    - OpenAI ecosystem features
    - Established prompts that work

  use_both:
    - Test for your specific use case
    - A/B testing in production
    - Fallback redundancy

Production Considerations

Migration Path

class MultiProviderLLM:
    """Support multiple LLM providers with easy switching."""

    def __init__(self):
        self.anthropic = anthropic.Anthropic()
        self.openai = openai.OpenAI()

    async def generate(
        self,
        prompt: str,
        provider: str = "anthropic",
        model: str = None
    ) -> str:
        if provider == "anthropic":
            model = model or "claude-3-sonnet-20240229"
            response = self.anthropic.messages.create(
                model=model,
                max_tokens=1024,
                messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
            )
            return response.content[0].text
        else:
            model = model or "gpt-4-turbo"
            response = self.openai.chat.completions.create(
                model=model,
                messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
            )
            return response.choices[0].message.content

Cost Comparison

cost_comparison_rough:
  # Approximate pricing per million tokens
  claude_3_opus:
    input: $15
    output: $75
    use: Complex, high-value tasks

  claude_3_sonnet:
    input: $3
    output: $15
    use: General production

  claude_3_haiku:
    input: $0.25
    output: $1.25
    use: High-volume, simple tasks

  gpt_4_turbo:
    input: $10
    output: $30
    use: Comparison point

Key Takeaways

Claude 3 is a significant release. Evaluate it for your use cases.