Anthropic just released Claude 3, their most capable model family yet. With three tiers—Opus, Sonnet, and Haiku—they’re offering options for different use cases and budgets. Early testing shows impressive results, particularly for complex reasoning and coding.
Here’s my first look at Claude 3.
The Model Family
Three Tiers
claude_3_family:
opus:
positioning: Most capable, frontier
use_case: Complex analysis, research, coding
context: 200K tokens
cost: Higher
sonnet:
positioning: Balanced capability and cost
use_case: General tasks, production workloads
context: 200K tokens
cost: Moderate
haiku:
positioning: Fast and affordable
use_case: High-volume, simple tasks
context: 200K tokens
cost: Lower
Capability Improvements
improvements:
reasoning:
- Better multi-step reasoning
- Improved mathematical capabilities
- More accurate analysis
coding:
- Better code generation
- Improved debugging
- Multi-file understanding
vision:
- Native image understanding
- Document analysis
- Chart interpretation
context:
- 200K context window
- Better long-context performance
- Improved retrieval within context
safety:
- Reduced refusals for benign requests
- Better nuanced responses
- Maintained safety boundaries
API Usage
Basic Integration
import anthropic
client = anthropic.Anthropic()
# Using Claude 3 Opus
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-3-opus-20240229",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[
{"role": "user", "content": "Analyze this code for security issues."}
]
)
print(response.content[0].text)
Vision Capabilities
import base64
def analyze_image(image_path: str, prompt: str) -> str:
with open(image_path, "rb") as f:
image_data = base64.standard_b64encode(f.read()).decode()
response = client.messages.create(
model="claude-3-opus-20240229",
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "image",
"source": {
"type": "base64",
"media_type": "image/png",
"data": image_data
}
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": prompt
}
]
}
]
)
return response.content[0].text
# Analyze an architecture diagram
result = analyze_image(
"architecture.png",
"Describe this system architecture and identify potential issues."
)
Choosing the Right Model
class ClaudeRouter:
"""Route requests to appropriate Claude 3 model."""
MODELS = {
"opus": "claude-3-opus-20240229",
"sonnet": "claude-3-sonnet-20240229",
"haiku": "claude-3-haiku-20240307"
}
def select_model(self, request: dict) -> str:
# Opus for complex tasks
if request.get("complexity") == "high":
return self.MODELS["opus"]
# Haiku for simple, high-volume
if request.get("volume") == "high" and request.get("complexity") == "low":
return self.MODELS["haiku"]
# Sonnet as default
return self.MODELS["sonnet"]
Comparison with GPT-4
Strengths and Trade-offs
claude_3_vs_gpt4:
claude_3_strengths:
- Longer context (200K vs 128K)
- Often more nuanced responses
- Better at following complex instructions
- More balanced safety (fewer unnecessary refusals)
gpt4_strengths:
- Larger ecosystem
- More integrations
- Established track record
- Function calling maturity
similar:
- Overall capability tier
- Vision capabilities
- Coding ability
When to Use Which
model_selection:
prefer_claude_3:
- Long document analysis
- Nuanced writing tasks
- Complex instruction following
- Research and analysis
prefer_gpt4:
- Existing GPT integrations
- Specific function calling needs
- OpenAI ecosystem features
- Established prompts that work
use_both:
- Test for your specific use case
- A/B testing in production
- Fallback redundancy
Production Considerations
Migration Path
class MultiProviderLLM:
"""Support multiple LLM providers with easy switching."""
def __init__(self):
self.anthropic = anthropic.Anthropic()
self.openai = openai.OpenAI()
async def generate(
self,
prompt: str,
provider: str = "anthropic",
model: str = None
) -> str:
if provider == "anthropic":
model = model or "claude-3-sonnet-20240229"
response = self.anthropic.messages.create(
model=model,
max_tokens=1024,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
)
return response.content[0].text
else:
model = model or "gpt-4-turbo"
response = self.openai.chat.completions.create(
model=model,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": prompt}]
)
return response.choices[0].message.content
Cost Comparison
cost_comparison_rough:
# Approximate pricing per million tokens
claude_3_opus:
input: $15
output: $75
use: Complex, high-value tasks
claude_3_sonnet:
input: $3
output: $15
use: General production
claude_3_haiku:
input: $0.25
output: $1.25
use: High-volume, simple tasks
gpt_4_turbo:
input: $10
output: $30
use: Comparison point
Key Takeaways
- Claude 3 introduces three tiers: Opus (best), Sonnet (balanced), Haiku (fast/cheap)
- 200K context window across all tiers
- Native vision capabilities
- Improved reasoning and coding
- Reduced unnecessary safety refusals
- Multi-provider strategy remains valuable
- Test for your specific use cases
- Sonnet is likely the sweet spot for most production use
- Haiku excellent for high-volume simple tasks
- Competition benefits everyone building with LLMs
Claude 3 is a significant release. Evaluate it for your use cases.