AI Governance in Practice

March 3, 2025

AI governance has moved from “nice to have” to “must have.” Regulations are taking effect, enterprise requirements are formalizing, and the risks of ungoverned AI are becoming clear. But governance that blocks innovation defeats the purpose.

Here’s how to implement AI governance that enables safe, rapid adoption.

The Governance Challenge

Why Governance Matters

governance_drivers:
  regulatory:
    - EU AI Act enforcement
    - Industry-specific requirements
    - Data protection laws
    - Emerging national frameworks

  business:
    - Risk management
    - Brand protection
    - Customer trust
    - Competitive advantage

  operational:
    - Quality assurance
    - Cost control
    - Security
    - Accountability

Common Failures

governance_failures:
  too_restrictive:
    symptoms:
      - AI projects blocked indefinitely
      - Shadow AI proliferates
      - Innovation moves elsewhere
    cause: "Governance designed to say no"

  too_permissive:
    symptoms:
      - Incidents and surprises
      - Compliance gaps
      - Uncontrolled costs
    cause: "No governance at all"

  wrong_focus:
    symptoms:
      - Checkbox compliance
      - Security theater
      - Real risks unaddressed
    cause: "Form over substance"

Governance Framework

Risk-Based Approach

risk_based_governance:
  tier_1_low_risk:
    examples:
      - Internal tools with human oversight
      - Content drafting with review
      - Data analysis assistance

    requirements:
      - Basic documentation
      - Standard security
      - Usage monitoring

    approval: "Team level"

  tier_2_medium_risk:
    examples:
      - Customer-facing with guardrails
      - Automated workflows with checks
      - Data processing pipelines

    requirements:
      - Formal risk assessment
      - Testing and evaluation
      - Incident response plan
      - Regular review

    approval: "Department level"

  tier_3_high_risk:
    examples:
      - Autonomous decision-making
      - Sensitive data processing
      - Safety-critical applications

    requirements:
      - Comprehensive documentation
      - External review
      - Continuous monitoring
      - Human oversight mandatory

    approval: "Executive level"

Practical Implementation

class AIGovernanceSystem:
    """Implement AI governance processes."""

    async def submit_use_case(
        self,
        use_case: UseCase,
        submitter: User
    ) -> SubmissionResult:
        # Auto-classify risk tier
        risk_tier = await self._classify_risk(use_case)

        # Generate requirements
        requirements = self._get_requirements(risk_tier)

        # Create governance record
        record = await self.create_record(
            use_case=use_case,
            submitter=submitter,
            risk_tier=risk_tier,
            requirements=requirements
        )

        # Route for approval
        approvers = self._get_approvers(risk_tier)
        await self.notify_approvers(record, approvers)

        return SubmissionResult(
            record_id=record.id,
            risk_tier=risk_tier,
            requirements=requirements,
            estimated_approval_time=self._estimate_time(risk_tier)
        )

    async def _classify_risk(self, use_case: UseCase) -> str:
        risk_factors = {
            "customer_facing": 2,
            "automated_decisions": 3,
            "sensitive_data": 3,
            "safety_implications": 4,
            "regulatory_scope": 2,
            "no_human_oversight": 3,
        }

        score = sum(
            risk_factors.get(factor, 0)
            for factor in use_case.characteristics
        )

        if score >= 8:
            return "tier_3"
        elif score >= 4:
            return "tier_2"
        return "tier_1"

Documentation Requirements

AI System Card

ai_system_card:
  overview:
    name: "Customer Support Assistant"
    owner: "Support Engineering"
    deployment_date: "2025-02-01"
    risk_tier: "tier_2"

  purpose:
    description: "AI assistant for customer support agents"
    use_cases:
      - Draft responses to customer inquiries
      - Summarize customer history
      - Suggest relevant documentation
    non_uses:
      - Autonomous customer communication
      - Decision on refunds/credits
      - Access to payment information

  data:
    inputs: ["Customer messages", "Support history", "Documentation"]
    data_classification: "Confidential"
    pii_handling: "Processed but not stored"
    retention: "Session only"

  model:
    provider: "Anthropic"
    model: "Claude 3.5 Sonnet"
    version_policy: "Pin to specific version"

  safeguards:
    input_filtering: "Yes - injection detection"
    output_filtering: "Yes - PII redaction"
    human_oversight: "Agent reviews all drafts"
    fallback: "Manual handling"

  monitoring:
    quality_metrics: ["Accuracy", "Helpfulness", "Safety"]
    review_frequency: "Weekly"
    incident_process: "Support escalation"

Continuous Compliance

continuous_compliance:
  automated_checks:
    - Model version tracking
    - Usage pattern monitoring
    - Cost threshold alerts
    - Security scan integration

  periodic_reviews:
    tier_1: "Annual"
    tier_2: "Quarterly"
    tier_3: "Monthly"

  audit_trail:
    - All AI interactions logged
    - Governance decisions recorded
    - Changes tracked
    - Accessible for review

Key Takeaways

Good governance accelerates AI adoption. Build it right.