// Topics / Evaluation
Evaluation
Definition
Evaluation coverage in this archive spans 4 posts from Feb 2024 to Mar 2026 and treats evaluation as a production discipline: evaluation loops, tool boundaries, escalation paths, and cost control. The strongest adjacent threads are ai, llm, and quality. Recurring title motifs include ai, evaluation, model, and llm.
Key claims
- The archive repeatedly argues that evaluation only creates leverage when it is wired into an existing workflow.
- The consistent theme from 2024 to 2026 is disciplined execution over hype cycles.
- This topic repeatedly intersects with ai, llm, and quality, so design choices here rarely stand alone.
Practical checklist
- Define quality gates up front: eval sets, guardrails, and explicit rollback criteria.
- Start with the newest post to calibrate current constraints, then backtrack to older entries for first principles.
- When boundary questions appear, cross-read ai and llm before committing implementation details.
Failure modes
- Shipping agent behavior without hard boundaries for tools, data access, and approvals.
- Optimizing for model novelty while ignoring reliability, latency, or cost drift.
- Applying guidance from 2024 to 2026 without revisiting assumptions as context changed.
Suggested reading path
- Start here (current state): AI Production Governance: A Maturity Model
- Then read (operating middle): How I Actually Test LLM Features
- Finish with (foundational context): LLM Evaluation: Stop Shipping on Vibes
Related posts
- AI Production Governance: A Maturity Model
- Picking an AI Model for Production (Late 2024)
- How I Actually Test LLM Features
- LLM Evaluation: Stop Shipping on Vibes
References
3 entries tagged “Evaluation”